Taking a closer look at all the genius of the Samsung Galaxy S4 ad

Yesterday BGR posted a story with the following title:

“The genius of Samsung ads: Even the most gimmicky features look like must-haves”.

Ok. Last week I watched the Galaxy S4 ad and a week later I can still remember thinking “Again? Did they really need to show yet again that little trick of transferring files by rubbing phones? Haven’t they done that enough with all the other 10 videos promoting the feature? Even Microsoft mocked them by calling out ‘one-trick-pony’ when proud Galaxy users did their little bumping trick in the Lumia 920 ad.”

The BGR post goes on:

“Samsung isn’t doing anything new with this ad but is rather sticking to its very winning formula of showing how the Galaxy S4 makes life more enjoyable in real-world situations while using the right dose of humor to rib chief rival Apple. This new ad is particularly effective because it overwhelms us with new features whose cumulative effect is to make the iPhone 5 look out of date by comparison.”

I decided to watch the ad once again, paying close attention to all the features it presents.

Here we go:

00:23 – Answer the phone by waving over the device
00:36 – Transferring files by proximity
00:42 – Sequence shots in the same photo
01:00 – Keep pointing at the device to read a text message
01:13 – Remote control (with the tiny disclaimer Initial set-up required)

Next I looked up apps in the AppStore that brought the same features displayed in the ad. Before saying that the comparison isn’t fair, afterall not all of them are native iPhone apps, here’s a reminder that what we’re exploring here is the premise that iPhones are obsolete because they can’t do what the Galaxy S4 does.

00:23 - Answer the phone by waving over the device
Score! We start with an exclusive Galaxy S4 feature (although I’m convinced that Jaibroken devices can do the same thing).

To be perfectly honest, even if I had a Galaxy, I wouldn’t use this feature to answer the phone. First, I’m never in an environment that makes me use speakerphone. I actually think that it’s rude to use speakerphone in a public place. It’s like when people decide to listen to loud music in the bus. Nobody should have to listen to what you’re listening to. Same thing with calls. Now, could this be a nice feature to maybe use when you’re driving? Maybe. But does the Galaxy S4 come with the feature that pays your traffic tickets?

Second, when the phone rings and I can’t answer it, I just don’t. The possibility to wave at the phone wouldn’t change that.

In the end, I just don’t think this is a very practical feature. What demands less work? Answering the phone like this, or the way iPhone users are used to? And what caused more surprise (since what’s being discussed here is the capability to innovate, surprise and shift the paradigm?) when presented? Here’s the video for a quick comparison.

00:36 - Transferring files by proximity
There’s an app for that. For free. Since 2009. Bump is the 21st most downloaded free app for iPhone of all time, according to a list by Apple that’s at most a week old.

00:42 - Sequence shots in the same photo
There’s an app for that. That’s all.

01:00 - Keep pointing at the device to read a text message
Pretty much like the feature that answers the phone with the little wave over it, I just don’t think this is practical. Besides, in the ad everything always works. However we’ve seen that in real life things are… uhm… different.

01:13 – Remote control (Initial set-up required)
Initial set-up required? Oh, great. In that case the iPhone/AppleTV ecossystem sounds like the best option by far. There are so many ways to explore the interaction between the two that it’d demand a new article just for that. Not to mention that depending on your needs, you know, there’s an app for that.

Bottom line:
Except for the no-touch phone interactions, all (three) innovations that make the iPhone “seem obsolete by comparison” are not only available to iPhone users, but they’ve actually been around since before the Galaxy S4 existed.

I don’t know exactly what is the winning formula that the BGR post referred to. What I see here is infact another old formula. The one that adds existing features to the Galaxy. And, you know, the one that says that you’ll be cool if you transfer a photo by rubbing phones.

Regarding all these drop tests

Recently, with arrival of the Samsung Galaxy S4, a new batch of drop tests comparing its durability against the iPhone 5 have surfaced on the web and spread around in most tech blogs I can remember.

I for one think that these videos have stopped being informative a long time ago, and now they are downright disrespectful for two reasons: One, the tests conducted generally in these people’s backyards have less scientific proof as Mulder’s escapades during the 10 seasons of The X Files. Second, because the point of this video is to make people cringe instead of informing them. It’s disrespectful not only to everyone involved in the development (or copying) of the device, but also to every single person who covets the device being destroyed but can’t buy it for reasons as simple as that they can’t afford it.

Now I do have a sense of humor. Back when Will It Blend first appeared, blending golf balls, credit cards, used batteries and even iDevices, they made me chuckle. I was curious when iFixIt started releasing videos regarding the durability of the iPhone 4, 4S and 5. Is the iPhone 5 body really that easily scratchable? But that’s it.

The day that followed the iPhone 5 launch, I can remember seeing a video of one idiot coming out of an Apple Store holding an iPhone 5, shouting at the huge line eager to purchase their devices that he was about to conduct an experiment, and dropping the phone face-down against the concrete. The phone’s screen obviously shattered completely, and while the crowd (and myself) cringed instantly, the idiot closed his act saying that this was the first broken iPhone 5 in the world.

It all went downhill after that. People started filming their phones being dropping from their hands, couches, counters, rolling over them with cars, throwing them around, doing pretty much everything that breaks most things we all own.

But why do these people do this? It’s not for the benefit of Science. It’s definitely not for the benefit of their viewers. So all I’m left with is that they do this because it’s an easy way to call attention. Maybe get a few extra thousand views if it gets published in a tech blog (and hey, we know it will). But am I the only one who finds this disrespectful? Every time I see a new post with one of these experiments (I have stopped watching the actual videos a while ago), I think that an iPhone 5 with contract starts at U$800 here in Brazil. I think of all the people who would do anything to get one. I think of the kid who sold his kidney for an iPad.

Although I can’t understand why people do stupid things like that, I know that it’s inevitable. What I do know to be possible is that major tech blogs could just stop posting every asshole throwing a phone against the floor until it breaks. But hey, before video views come page views, right? And who wants to see that hit the floor?

Rock Snooze: Andreas Kisser wakes you up with progressively heavier riffs

After a long, long period of hibernation, São Paulo’s 89FM – The Rock Radio is finally back in action. To promote their return, they created an app together with Andreas Kisser which is made to replace the regular iPhone alarm. Rock Snooze is a pretty cool idea. A very calm guitar riff played by Kisser wakes you up. Every time you press the snooze button, the app will wake you up 5 minutes later playing a heavier riff than the last.

The video (in portuguese) explains the whole thing, but from 00:50 on you can see how the app works.

Such a cool idea. The only things I thought were annoying were the ‘wake up’ voice overs in the first and second riffs. A few more riffs would also be cool.

Gradiente CEO: “The decision to apprehend the iPhone brand has been lifted”. Kidnap continues.

According to G1, Eugenio Staub, Gradiente CEO said that the decision that gained the spotlights yesterday was published with delay by INPI, and that it has already been reversed after Gradiende filed a petition to review the case.

This means that Gradiente keep moving with their extortion process. The iPhone brand continues kidnapped in Brazil.

Related:
Brazilian Justice confiscates the iPhone name rights in Brazil from Gradiente due to a company debt
Gradiente and Apple negotiating rights for the iPhone name in Brazil
Apple files a new petition to invalidate Gradiente’s iPhone license
Pathetic: IGB Eletronica says the company is open to selling iPhone rights in Brazil
INPI postpones the date for the formal decision favoring Gradiente in the iPHONE case
It’s not just the iPhone. In the 90s, Gradiente registered the PlayStation brand.
Gradiente is either stupid, or dishonest. Probably both.
Brazilian company Gradiente releases a product called Iphone. Try not to laugh.

Brazilian Justice confiscates the iPhone name rights in Brazil from Gradiente due to a company debt

Think of the weirdest story written by David Lynch and directed by M. Night Shayamalan. Still, the saga for the rights to use the name iPhone in Brazil is even weirder. After the whole mess due to Gradiente having registered “by coincidence” the rights for the name iPhone in Brazil, not releasing an actual phone with the name until 2 weeks before the license expired, and then trying to extort Apple, now the company runs the risk of ending up with no money and no iPhone rights.

That’s because according to Olhar Digital, Brazilian Justice has seized the right to use the name from Gradiente, until the company pays a debt of R$947.000 (aprox U$470.000) that they owe to Banco do Brasil. The name has been confiscated because the Judge understood that since Gradiente was willing to negotiate the name rights with Apple, it could be considered an asset. Now the name can go to a public auction (yes, basically anybody interested in buying the naming rights will have the opportunity to do so) to pay for what Gradiente owes to Banco do Brasil.

I have to say that it gives me great pleasure to see that Gradiente is running a serious risk of ending up with no brand and without a single dime they were dreaming about extorting from Apple as the sort of ransom for the naming rights they had been pursuing. I wonder if they had already planned to use part of the money they’d get from Apple to pay Banco do Brasil. Karma is a bitch.

Related:
Gradiente and Apple negotiating rights for the iPhone name in Brazil
Apple files a new petition to invalidate Gradiente’s iPhone license
Pathetic: IGB Eletronica says the company is open to selling iPhone rights in Brazil
INPI postpones the date for the formal decision favoring Gradiente in the iPHONE case
It’s not just the iPhone. In the 90s, Gradiente registered the PlayStation brand.
Gradiente is either stupid, or dishonest. Probably both.
Brazilian company Gradiente releases a product called Iphone. Try not to laugh.

Mailbox: “A security fail” exposing your emails, contacts and attachments

That’s how Subhransu Behera starts his post explaining that if you are a Mailbox app user, all it takes for important information like email contents, contacts and mail attachments to become acessible on your iPhone is to plug it on a computer and use a program like iExplorer.

Looks like today is going to be a pretty busy day at Orchestra, Inc.

Via 9to5mac

Guess what: People are reporting battery issues after updating to iOS 6.1.3

Alright. There it is. Took a few days, but it’s here. Cult of Mac made a post on how some users have been reporting battery issues since they updated their iDevices to 6.1.3.

The good news is that this sort of story can always serve as a template for next versions of the iOS.

Related post:
Shocking: Reports of iOS 6.0.2 update bringing battery issues